|
Land Contamination & Reclamation 2006 |
On-line |
||||
| Abstract | Full
text at Ingenta |
||||
| Volume 14 (1) 2006 | |||||
| UK stabilization/solidification treatment and remediation – Part I: binders, technologies, testing and research | A. Al-Tabbaa & A.S.R. Perera | ›› | ›› | ||
| UK stabilization/solidification treatment and remediation – Part II: Performance, QA/QC and guidance documents | A. Al-Tabbaa & A.S.R. Perera | ›› | |||
| Mechanisms
of lead immobilization in treated soils |
D. Dermatas et al. | ›› | ›› | ||
| In
situ soil mixing treatment of contaminated soils and groundwater: two case
studies |
C.W. Evans | ›› | |||
| Brownfield
development: the remediation and demolition of two MGP sites and a former
steel mill |
M.A. Fleri & G.T. Whetstone | ›› | |||
| Assessing
the true technical/environmental impacts of contaminated land remediation – a case study of containment, disposal and no action |
M.J. Harbottle et al. | ›› | ›› | ||
| S/S experience in France | M.C. Magnié | ›› | ›› | ||
| The
temperature dependency of the hardening of stabilized/solidified contaminated
soil |
B. Chitambira et al. | ›› | ›› | ||
| Volume 14 (2) 2006 | |||||
| International Symposium and Exhibition on the Redevelopment of Manufactured Gas Plant Sites, 4 – 6 April 2006, Reading, UK | |||||
| Opening plenary session | |||||
| Foresight of an MGP operator in the 1940s and 1950s vs. hindsight of an environmental remediator or protector (EPA) in the 2000s | W.P. Earley | ›› | ›› | ||
| World history of manufactured gas: a ‘world’ of land redevelopment possibilities | A.W. Hatheway | ›› | ›› | ||
| Session 1. Site redevelopment: case studies I | |||||
| Clean-up
of the Grasbrook Gasworks in the HafenCity of Hamburg |
M. Großcurth et al. | ›› | ›› | ||
| Remediation
of a gasworks site for residential development: the Wharf Lane site, Solihull,
UK |
I. Heasman & F.J. Westcott | ›› | ›› | ||
| From
wasteland to green parkland, the remediation of the former West Melbourne
gasworks, Victoria, Australia |
K.N. Mival et al. | ›› | ›› | ||
| Westergasfabriek
Amsterdam |
E. Verhagen | ›› | ›› | ||
| Session 2. Regulating and managing the environmental impact of remediation | |||||
| Factors
affecting soil clean-up levels achievable by thermal desorption technologies
at MGP sites |
W.L. Troxler & T.W. Brankley | ›› | ›› | ||
| The
environmental impact of conducting environmental work |
B.T. Foster | ›› | ›› | ||
| Stack
emissions and ambient air quality impacts from thermal desorption systems
at MGP sites |
W.L. Troxler et al. | ›› | ›› | ||
| Session 3. Treatment | |||||
| The
use of slurry phase bioreactor technology for the remediation of coal tars |
R.A.P. Thomas et al. | ›› | ›› | ||
| Remediation
of the former gasworks, High Wycombe, UK |
S.E. Arch et al. | ›› | ›› | ||
| Energy
recovery and cost-effective remediation of manufactured gas plant waste
at a fixed-base medium temperature thermal desorption facility |
D.A. Hargens et al. | ›› | ›› | ||
| Comparison
of pilot-scale bioremediation of PAH Contaminated construction rubble with
laboratory tests |
B. Gemende et al. | ›› | ›› | ||
| Session 4. Sediment management and ecological risk | |||||
| Bioavailability
and toxicity of PAHs at MGP Sites |
E.F. Neuhauser et al. | ›› | ›› | ||
| Case
study: large-scale clean-up of NAPL in riverbed, river diversion and restoration
– Fort Collins, Colorado, USA |
C.A. Haas et al. | ›› | ›› | ||
| Liquid
sediment: behavior of water gas process MGP tars in the aquatic environment |
G.W. Cross | ›› | ›› | ||
| Assessment
and closure issues related to contaminated sediments at MGP sites |
C.A. Menzie et al. | ›› | |||
| Managing
sediments at MGP sites – finding the balance between technical feasibility,
protectiveness and cost |
S.D. Messur et al. | ›› | |||
| Session 5. Monitored natural attenuation | |||||
| Enabling
site development through natural attenuation and plume stabilization monitoring
at a former gas works in Dartford, UK: a corporate approach and the lessons
learned |
A.G. Lee et al. | ›› | ›› | ||
| Natural
attenuation at tar oil contaminated sites – results from the German
funding priority KORA |
N. Hüsers et al. | ›› | ›› | ||
| Field-scale
investigations of natural attenuation processes on the tar oil contaminated
site of a wood preservation facility – a case study |
C. Leibenath et al. | ›› | ›› | ||
| Natural
attenuation of an MGP plume – 14 years after source removal |
J.A. Ripp & E.F. Neuhauser | ›› | |||
| Session 6. Public stakeholder involvement and policy issues | |||||
| Clean-up
of an MGP site at an elementary school in Ottawa, Illinois, USA |
L.F. Milner | ›› | ›› | ||
| The
importance of risk communication in the successful design and implementation
of a remedy at a former MGP site |
J.R. Ash & M.V. Leone | ›› | ›› | ||
| Citizen
participation in decision-making: the role of the independent overseer in
(re)building trust |
C.P. Nathanail | ›› | ›› | ||
| Business
management considerations in the selection of institutional and engineering
controls for MGP site remediation |
D.J. Morgan et al. | ›› | |||
| Session 7. Emerging and innovative technologies I | |||||
| Remediation
of the former gas plant in Munich by Funnel-and-Gate |
J. Weindl et al. | ›› | ›› | ||
| Monitoring
of organic and inorganic parameters for a full-scale in situ pulsed air-sparging
programme |
A.R.G. Shields et al. | ›› | ›› | ||
| Demonstration
of tailored levels of in situ heating for remediation of a former MGP site |
R.S. Baker et al. | ›› | ›› | ||
| DARAMEND®
bioremediation for the treatment of PAH impacted soils and sediments |
A. Seech et al. | ›› | ›› | ||
| Session 8. Economics of MGP reuse | |||||
| Insurance
recovery for manufactured gas plant remediations |
M.J. Lynch et al. | ›› | ›› | ||
| Assessing
the costs and benefits of MGP site remediation |
P.E. Hardisty et al. | ›› | ›› | ||
| Financing
MGP clean-up through recovery on historic liability insurance policies |
L.J. Eisenstein & J.L. Malanchuk | ›› | ›› | ||
| Where
does the reuse money come from? |
C.L. McIntosh | ›› | |||
| Session 9. Site redevelopment – case studies II | |||||
| Safety
and environment impact assessment as part of remediation options analysis |
R. Bracken et al. | ›› | ›› | ||
|
Brownfields remedial action and redevelopment of the Adriaen's Landing former
MGP site |
P.F. Muniz & P.D. McLellan | ›› | ›› | ||
|
Redevelopment of a manufactured gas plant site into SBC (Pac Bell) Ball
Park using a risk-based approach |
M.B. Bloes et al. | ›› | |||
| Case study using a multidisciplinary approach – ground investigation, risk assessment, groundwater lowering and site remediation at Wymondham Manufactured Gas Plant | G.W. Farrant et al. | ›› | ›› | ||
| Session 10. Forensics | |||||
| The
more the merrier: identifying other PRPs at MGP properties |
C.G. Johnson | ›› | ›› | ||
| Estimating
soil pollution at gasworks sites |
P.O. de Vries & K.R. Weytingh | ›› | ›› | ||
|
Determining the source of PAHs in sediment |
S.D. Emsbo-Mattingly et al. | ›› | ›› | ||
| Source
characterization and identification as a means of assessing the type of
bonding in the soil and its subsequent impact on bioavailability |
P. Mulvey & C. McKay | ›› | ›› | ||
| Session 11. Managing large MGP portfolios | |||||
|
Management of former gas works sites by Gaz De France |
G. Lemoine & O. Gosset | ›› | ›› | ||
| Third-party
auditing of the assessment and remediation of four rural manufacturing gasworks,
Victoria, Australia |
P. Sinclair et al. | ›› | ›› | ||
| A
unified multi-state utility MGP management program |
A.C. Fernandes & A.C. Middleton | ›› | |||
|
Effective clean-up strategies for fast-track sustainable redevelopment of
Con Edison's former MGP sites |
M.A. Miller | ›› | |||
|
Effective clean-up strategies for redeveloping MGP Sites in Southern California,
USA |
S. Craig et al. | ›› | |||
| Session 12. Overcoming legal and regulatory hurdles/developing best practice | |||||
| Innovative
regulatory approach to MGP site clean-up and redevelopment ‘the North
Carolina MGP Program’ |
T. Silar et al. | ›› | ›› | ||
|
Thiocyanates, do you have a problem or not? |
P.O. de Vries & K.R. Weytingh | ›› | ›› | ||
| Toxicity:
a legal analysis |
J. Voorhees & L. Bade | ›› | ›› | ||
| Corporate
governance issues, land contamination and reclamation |
L.S. Spedding | ›› | ›› | ||
| Session 13. Containment and control of subsurface contamination | |||||
| Long-term
performance of a passive groundwater treatment system |
S. Oosting et al. | ›› | ›› | ||
| In
situ bioremediation of cyanide, PAHs and organic compounds using an engineered
SEquenced REactive BARrier (SEREBAR) |
J.D.F. Robinson et al. | ›› | ›› | ||
| Slurry
wall containment at National Grid's Harbor Point site |
M.S. Schultz & T.W. Young | ›› | ›› | ||
| MGP
NAPL interception with organophyllic media: flow-through column test results |
M.J. Gefell et al. | ›› | ›› | ||
| Session 14. A US model for collaborative research on MGP sites | |||||
| Using
an appropriate bedrock investigation procedure for a coal tar-impacted fractured
bedrock aquifer |
A.J. Coleman | ›› | ›› | ||
| Case
study: confirmation of TarGOST laser-induced fluorescence DNAPL delineation
with soil boring data |
M.B. Okin et al. | ›› | ›› | ||
| Air
emission monitoring, vapor control and public communications during MGP
site excavation in close proximity to neighbours |
J.W. Lingle et al. | ›› | ›› | ||
| Survey
of the distribution and sources of PAHs in urban surface soils |
D.M. Mauro et al. | ›› | ›› | ||
| Session 15. Emerging and innovative technologies II | |||||
| Sources
and innovative treatment of ammonium at former manufactured gas plants |
J.D.F. Robinson et al. | ›› | ›› | ||
| DNAPL
recovery evaluations at five MGP sites |
D.A. Hargens et al. | ›› | ›› | ||
| Field
results with an alkaline in situ chemical oxidation process |
J. Birnstingl et al. | ›› | |||
| In
situ chemical oxidation for remediation of manufactured gas plant residuals |
G.E. Hoag et al. | ›› | |||
| Experiences
of the use of in situ chemical oxidation (ISCO) technology for remediation
of MGP sites in the USA |
I.P. Murarka | ›› | |||
| Session 16. Risk assessment and risk communications | |||||
| The
Australian risk-based approach to assessing and remediating MGPs |
J. Clay | ›› | ›› | ||
|
Risk-based remediation of a former MGP site in Italy |
N. Lazovic et al. | ›› | ›› | ||
| Risk
assessment and risk communication to populations near former manufactured
gas plant sites in New York City |
C. Leary et al. | ›› | ›› | ||
|
Human health risk assessment: application of the NORISC-HRA and ROME models
at two test sites |
F. Quercia et al. | ›› | ›› | ||
| Poster presentations | |||||
| Monitoring | |||||
| In
situ characterization of NAPL with TarGOST® at MGP sites (NAPL characterization
of MGPs using TarGOST® |
R.W. St. Germain et al. | ›› | ›› | ||
| Characterization
of the bioavailability and toxicity of PAHs at MGP sites |
J.P. Kreitinger et al. | ›› | |||
| Role
of PAH bioavailability in determining human health risks for soil impacted
with lampblack at oil gas manufactured gas plant sites |
A. Borhnerud et al. | ›› | |||
| A
simplified approach for predicting the migration of creosote and coal tar
wastes in complex hydrogeologic environments |
N.J. Misquitta & T.E. Jordan | ›› | |||
| Case studies | |||||
| Back
to the future: an American case study on estimating future MGP remediation
costs |
J.L. Malanchuk et al. | ›› | ›› | ||
| MGP-impacted
sediment remediation in a Northeastern United States river and lake –
stakeholder positions and regulatory requirements |
G.F. Zak et al. | ›› | ›› | ||
| Manufactured
gas plant remediation beneath a building: underpinning as an alternative
to demolition |
A.C. Fernandes & J. Roberts | ›› | ›› | ||
| Risk
communication – the importance of investing in stakeholders to reach
a reasonable solution |
J. Phillips | ›› | ›› | ||
| Implementation
of vapor intrusion evaluation – what might you find? |
J. Phillips & L. Collins | ›› | ›› | ||
| Forensic
observation during MGP site remediation |
A.C. Middleton et al. | ›› | |||
| Re-developing
an operating LNG terminal and former MGP to reduce contaminant migration
and minimize worker exposure |
P. Snyder et al. | ›› | |||
| A
former mill and MGP become a model US brownfield project – how a collaborative
effort of diverse public and private interests revitalized the former Essex
Mills in Newmarket New Hampshire |
F.W. Johnson & G. Blessing | ›› | |||
| In
situ stabilization/solidification of MGP wastes: project life cycle |
M.A. Fleri & G.T. Whetstone | ›› | |||
| Corporate
succession, potentially responsible parties (PRPs), and the role of historians:
some detective tales from the field |
M. Reis | ›› | |||
| Treatment | |||||
| A
simple low-cost and innovative approach to the removal of coal tar from
groundwater and historic structures at former MGPs |
R.A.P. Thomas et al. | ›› | ›› | ||
| Thermal
well operation in the saturated zone – new options for DNAPL remediation |
U. Hiester et al. | ›› | ›› | ||
| In-pile
thermal desorption of PAHs, PCBs and dioxins/furans in soil and sediment |
R.S. Baker et al. | ›› | ›› | ||
| In
situ biogeochemical stabilization of creosote/pentachlorophenol NAPLS using
catalyzed and buffered permanganate: pilot and full scale applications |
J. Mueller et al. | ›› | ›› | ||
| Pilot
plant results for groundwater remediation at the former gas work remediation
site ‘Leopoldau’ in Vienna, Austria |
W. Fuchs et al. | ›› | ›› | ||
| Permeable
reactive barriers (PRBs) for manufactured gas plants and related sites:
performances achieved and outlook |
V. Birke et al. | ›› | |||
| Remediating
small gasworks sites using an offsite soil treatment hub |
P. Mulvey & R. Negrelli | ›› | |||
| What
gas works waste can't be bioremediated? |
P. Mulvey | ›› | |||
| Containment and control | |||||
| MGP
NAPL management using hydraulic gradient modification |
G.M. Thomas et al. | ›› | ›› | ||
| Environmental
fate and transport of ammonia generated at a former gasworks site, East
Anglia, United Kingdom |
P. Burris et al. | ›› | ›› | ||
| Hydraulic
control and containment of cyanide-containing MGP waste at a natural gas
service center in Pennsylvania, USA |
M.S. Raybuck & G.W. Hermance | ›› | ›› | ||
| Cautionary
American experiences in FMGP site remediation |
A.W. Hatheway & W.D. Lilley | ›› | |||
| Sediments | |||||
| Application
of gas chromatography in combination with atomic spectrometry and pyrolysis
for environmental geochemical exploration of bottom sediments |
N.S. Safronova et al. | ›› | ›› | ||
| Nature
of organic carbon in MGP sediments: a mechanistic understanding of bioavailability |
U. Ghosh et al. | ›› | |||
| Measured
KOC and KBC values for '34' parent and alkyl PAHs in 40 historically-contaminated
sediments, and their relationship to Hyalella azteca toxicity |
S.B. Hawthorne & J.P. Kreitinger | ›› | |||
| Predicting PAH bioavailability and toxicity of MGP soils using solid phase micro extraction | M.T.O. Jonker et al. | ›› | |||
| Volume
14 (3) 2006 |
|||||
| The
derivation and use of soil screening values for metals for the ecological
risk assessment of contaminated land: a regulatory perspective |
G. Merrington et al. | ›› | ›› | ||
| Effect
of voltage gradient on integrated electrochemical remediation of contaminant
mixtures |
K.R. Reddy & M.R. Karri | ›› | ›› | ||
| Assessing
contaminant migration pathways and vertical gradients in a low-permeability
aquifer using multilevel borehole systems |
P. Dumble et al. | ›› | ›› | ||
| The
application of soil washing to the remediation of contaminated soils |
M. Pearl et al. | ›› | ›› | ||
| Volume 14 (4) 2006 | |||||
| Toxicology |
B.-J. Baars | ›› | ›› | ||
| Sludge
pond containment using CSV |
W. Oltmanns & H.-G. Dymek | ›› | ›› | ||
| Arsenic
mitigation strategy for rice, using water regime management |
S.M. Imamul Huq et al. | ›› | ›› | ||
| Paste
technology for tailings management |
T. Meggyes & Á. Debreczeni | ›› | ›› | ||
| Experience gained from the post-closure aftercare of the contained Münchehagen contaminated site | G. Nerlich | ›› | ›› | ||
|
Copyright
© 2006 EPP Publications |